官方APP下载:英语全能特训(微信小程序版,支持苹果手机、安卓手机)
创办于2003年
UNSV记不住?那就记中文谐音“忧安思危”吧!
  Slow and Steady Wins the Race!
UNSV英语学习频道 - Slow and steady wins the race!
公众微信服务号
英语全能特训(微信公众服务号)
UNSV英语学习频道淘宝网店
客服短信:18913948480
客服邮箱:web@unsv.com
初级VIP会员
全站英语学习资料下载。
¥98元/12个月

IN THE NEWS - Supreme Court Upholds Use of Race at Universities

阅读次数:


VIP会员专享下载:(非VIP会员无权下载!如果想下载,但还不是VIP会员,请点此订购
下载方式:使用鼠标右键(注意是鼠标右键!)点击下面的MP3音频/MP4视频链接,然后选择“另存为…”。
PDF节目文稿 PDF节目文稿  MP3节目录音 MP3节目录音 
文章正文
同步字幕

The Supreme Court says American colleges and universities can use race among other considerations to decide which students to accept. But the court also says there are limits to how much consideration schools should give to race in the admissions process.

The high court ruled Monday in two separate cases that involved the University of Michigan and its law school. Three white students brought the actions. They said programs aimed at creating a racially balanced student population were unfair to whites.

Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher had been denied admission to the undergraduate program. Barbara Grutter was rejected by the Michigan law school. They learned that African Americans and other minorities were admitted with lower scores than whites. They argued that this violated the Fourteen Amendment to the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of nineteen-sixty-four. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal treatment under the law.

In a five-to-four vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the Michigan law school policies are constitutional. The court said those policies consider race in a narrow way and do not violate the constitutional right of equal protection.

But in the second ruling, the court decided six to three that the Michigan undergraduate program violates the Constitution. This program gave blacks, Hispanics and American Indians twenty points toward the one-hundred points needed to guarantee admission. The court said this was unfair to white applicants.

Opponents of affirmative action say such programs put race and ethnicity ahead of ability. They say admissions policies should be race-neutral. Supporters say affirmative action helps balance a student population. This diversity, they say, creates a better learning environment for everyone.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the majority opinion to uphold the policies of the Michigan law school. She provided the fifth and deciding vote. She also agreed with Chief Justice William Rehnquist and the four other justices who voted to strike down the undergraduate program.

Many critics of affirmative action say they regret that the court did not go further to restrict racial preferences. Supporters call the rulings a victory in the struggle for racial diversity in American higher education.

The two Michigan cases are the most important affirmative action rulings since what is known as the Bakke decision twenty-five years ago. The Supreme Court ruled then, as now, that schools could consider race but within limits.

For one thing, Justice O'Connor says in the rulings this week that such policies must be limited in time. In her words, "The court expects that twenty-five years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary."

This VOA Special English program In the News was written by Cynthia Kirk. This is Steve Ember.

网友的学习评论(0条):
版权所有©2003-2019 南京通享科技有限公司,保留所有权利。未经书面许可,严禁转载本站内容,违者追究法律责任。 互联网经营ICP证:苏B2-20120186
网站备案:苏ICP备05000269号-1中国工业和信息化部网站备案查询
广播台